Appendix D |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Important Civilizations not reaching the highest rank |
EUROPE:
ASIA: |
Russia Germany Ottoman (Turkey) Portugal
Japan |
1915 1900 1500 1480
1960 |
1970 1945 1600 1530
1990 |
All dates AD unless noted BC |
|
|
||
|
Cambodia |
900 |
1200 |
|
|
|
||
|
China India-Ashoka Indus River (Pakistan) |
100BC 270BC 2500BC |
300AD 185BC 1700BC |
|
|
|
||
AFRICA: |
Zimbabwe |
600 |
700 |
|
|
|
||
|
Carthage (Tunisia) |
800BC |
201BC |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AMERICAS: |
Peru (Inca) |
1400 |
1500 |
|
|
|
||
|
Mexico: 1. Aztec |
1400 |
1500 |
|
|
|
||
|
2. Maya |
500 |
900 |
|
|
|
||
|
3.Teotihuacán |
100BC |
700AD |
The "struggle for recognition" among nations
This notion from Hegel was used by Fukuyana in his book "The End of History." It indicates that countries will go to war over prestige issues as much as for economic gains. Like the alpha male in a wolf pack, nations seem to want to be recognized as the "top dog." This desire led to some bitter conflicts in the 20th century, where Germany, Russia, and Japan strove for the "top dog" recognition their nations had never received. The Ottomans were similarly greatly feared, until their defeat at Vienna in 1529. In earlier centuries, nations were not as aware of other leading civilizations in the world (particularly in the Americas and Africa). On a regional basis, however, the "struggle for recognition" seems to have played an important part in warfare and in the development of World Leadership Civilizations (as with Rome vs Carthage).Go to: IQ's of 80 nations including the above and the areas of Leading Civilizations
Go to:
outline of this World Civilizations section of the websiteComments to:
VanSloan@yahoo.com